Significant Beneficial Ownership: Disclosure Requirements Under Section 90

Significant Beneficial Ownership: Disclosure Requirements Under Section 90

Significant Beneficial Ownership: Understanding Disclosure Requirements Under Section 90

In today’s business world, transparency is key. Indian authorities are increasingly focused on understanding who truly controls companies operating within the country. This push for clarity brings us to a crucial concept: Significant Beneficial Ownership (SBO). It’s about looking beyond the names listed on share certificates to identify the real individuals who ultimately own or wield control over a company. Understanding the rules around SBO, specifically the disclosure requirements Section 90 India, isn’t just about ticking a legal box; it’s fundamental for businesses to ensure compliance and avoid significant penalties. Even individuals holding shares indirectly might find these rules relevant. This post will break down the Section 90 guidelines for Indian companies, explaining what Significant Beneficial Ownership entails and the steps required for compliance.

What Exactly is Significant Beneficial Ownership (SBO)?

Understanding SBO starts with distinguishing between who appears to own shares and who actually benefits from or controls them. This distinction is central to the entire concept and compliance process.

Defining Beneficial Interest vs. Registered Owner

Imagine you own a house on paper (you are the registered owner), but your relative lives there, makes all decisions about its upkeep, and enjoys the benefit of living there. In the corporate world, a similar situation exists. The Registered Owner is the person or entity whose name is recorded in the company’s Register of Members as holding the shares. However, the Beneficial Owner is the individual who ultimately enjoys the economic benefits of those shares (like dividends) or can exercise control over how the shares are voted or managed, even if their name isn’t directly on the share certificate. The significant beneficial ownership laws India aim to identify these ultimate individual beneficiaries, piercing through layers of ownership structures.

Defining “Significant” – The Thresholds

Not every beneficial owner is considered “significant.” The term Significant Beneficial Owner specifically refers to an individual who meets certain criteria defined under the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, as amended. According to current Indian significant ownership rules, an individual qualifies as an SBO if they hold, indirectly or together with any direct holdings:

  • Not less than 10% of the company’s shares.
  • Not less than 10% of the voting rights in the shares.
  • The right to receive or participate in not less than 10% of the total distributable dividend or any other distribution in a financial year.

Furthermore, an individual can also be classified as an SBO if they have the right to exercise, or actually exercise, significant influence or control over the reporting company, other than through their direct holdings alone. This ‘significant influence or control’ aspect is crucial as it captures situations where influence is wielded through means other than just share percentage. Understanding these thresholds is the first step towards ensuring beneficial ownership compliance India.

Direct vs. Indirect Holding

The concept of “indirect” holding is vital for identifying SBOs. Direct holding is straightforward – the individual’s name is on the register of members. Indirect holding, however, involves holding interest through one or more intermediaries. The rules specify various ways an individual might hold an indirect interest, including:

  • Through a Body Corporate: If an individual holds the majority stake in a body corporate (other than a Limited Liability Partnership) which, in turn, holds shares in the reporting company.
  • Through a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF): If the individual is the Karta of the HUF, and the HUF holds interest in the reporting company.
  • Through a Partnership Entity: If the individual is a partner, or holds the majority stake in the body corporate which is a partner of the partnership entity, or in the ultimate holding company of that body corporate.
  • Through a Trust: If the individual is identified as a trustee (in certain cases), a beneficiary (if their interest is 10% or more), or an author/settlor (if their interest is 10% or more).
  • Through Pooled Investment Vehicles or Entities Controlled by Them: Where the individual holds interest through vehicles like mutual funds, AIFs etc., unless the vehicle itself is exempted.

Identifying indirect holdings often requires a careful examination of the entire ownership chain leading up to the individual.

The Legal Basis: Section 90 and SBO Rules

The requirement to identify and disclose SBOs stems directly from Indian corporate law, primarily Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the rules made under it.

Overview of Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013

Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 is the cornerstone legislation for Significant Beneficial Ownership in India. Its primary purpose is to mandate that companies identify the individuals who are SBOs in relation to the company and require those individuals to disclose their interests. The ultimate goal is to enhance corporate transparency and prevent the misuse of complex corporate structures for illicit purposes like money laundering or hiding unaccounted wealth. By demanding disclosure of the ultimate individual owners, Section 90 guidelines for Indian companies aim to ensure that regulatory authorities and stakeholders know who really controls corporate entities operating in India. This transparency is considered crucial for good corporate governance.

For businesses navigating these regulations, choosing the appropriate business structure from the outset can have significant compliance and administrative implications. Learn more about Choosing the Right Legal Structure for Your Business to set up foundations that align with your ownership and operational goals.

The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018

While Section 90 lays down the mandate, the detailed procedures, forms, timelines, and specific requirements are laid out in the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 (often referred to as the SBO Rules). These rules have been amended since their introduction to clarify definitions and processes. They operationalize Section 90 by specifying:

  • The precise definition and thresholds for identifying an SBO.
  • The method for calculating indirect holdings.
  • The duties of both the reporting company and the SBO.
  • The specific forms to be used for declarations and filings (BEN-1, BEN-2, BEN-3, BEN-4).
  • The timelines for compliance.
  • Exemptions from the rules.

These rules are essential reading for anyone needing to ensure beneficial ownership compliance India. For the latest version and amendments, it is advisable to consult the official Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) website: https://www.mca.gov.in/

Disclosure Requirements: Who Needs to Do What?

Understanding the burden of compliance can often feel daunting. For new companies and startups, establishing robust systems early on can ease the process. Consider insights on Company Registration in India to ensure initial compliance through structural understanding and preparation.

Duty of the Reporting Company

Every Indian company (unless specifically exempted) has an active duty to take necessary steps to identify individuals who are SBOs in relation to it. This isn’t a passive role; the company must actively seek out this information. If a company has reason to believe that a particular individual is an SBO, or that any member knows the identity of an SBO, or that a member might themselves be an SBO, the company is required to issue a notice in Form BEN-4. This notice seeks information about the beneficial interest. Fulfilling these disclosure requirements Section 90 India is a primary responsibility of the company’s management and officers. The company must diligently follow up on these notices and maintain records of its efforts.

Declaration by the Significant Beneficial Owner (Form BEN-1)

Once an individual is identified as a Significant Beneficial Owner (either through self-assessment or upon receiving Form BEN-4 from the company), they have a legal obligation to make a declaration to the reporting company. This declaration must be submitted in Form BEN-1. Key aspects of Form BEN-1 include:

  • Purpose: It serves as the official beneficial ownership declaration India by the SBO to the company.
  • Content: It requires detailed information about the SBO, including their personal details, the nature of their direct and indirect interest, the date of acquiring the SBO status, etc.
  • Timeline: An SBO must file Form BEN-1 with the reporting company within 30 days of acquiring such significant beneficial ownership or within 30 days of any change in their ownership status. For individuals who became SBOs upon the commencement of the rules, specific initial timelines were provided. Timely submission is crucial for compliance.

Company’s Return to the Registrar (Form BEN-2)

After receiving the BEN-1 declaration from the SBO, the reporting company’s duty continues. The company must then file this information with the Registrar of Companies (RoC). This is done using Form BEN-2, which is essentially a return of significant beneficial owners. Key points about Form BEN-2:

  • Purpose: To inform the RoC about the SBOs identified by the company based on the BEN-1 declarations received.
  • Content: It includes details of the SBOs as declared in Form BEN-1, along with company information and certification.
  • Timeline: The reporting company must file Form BEN-2 with the RoC within 30 days from the date of receipt of the BEN-1 declaration from the SBO. Meeting this deadline is a critical aspect of Section 90 compliance India. Failure to file BEN-2 on time attracts penalties.

Maintaining the Register of SBOs (Form BEN-3)

Beyond filing BEN-2, every company must maintain a dedicated register recording details of its Significant Beneficial Ownership. This register is prescribed as Form BEN-3. The key requirements are:

  • Content: It must contain the names, addresses, dates of birth, and details of the interest held by all SBOs identified.
  • Location: The register must be kept at the company’s registered office.
  • Inspection: The Register of Significant Beneficial Owners (BEN-3) must be open for inspection by members upon payment of prescribed fees and by the RoC or other authorized officials without any fee during business hours. This ensures transparency regarding the ultimate ownership of the company.

Here’s a quick summary of the key forms:

Form Purpose Who Submits? Submitted To Whom? Timeline
BEN-1 Declaration of Significant Beneficial Ownership SBO Reporting Company Within 30 days of acquiring SBO status / change
BEN-2 Return to the Registrar regarding Significant Beneficial Owners Company Registrar of Companies (RoC) Within 30 days of receiving BEN-1
BEN-3 Register of Significant Beneficial Owners Company Maintained by Company Ongoing
BEN-4 Notice by the Company seeking information about Significant Beneficial Owners Company Potential SBO / Member As needed by the company

Are There Any Exemptions?

Yes, the SBO rules provide exemptions for certain types of entities or shareholdings. The rules generally do not apply to the extent the shares of the reporting company are held by:

  • The IEPF (Investor Education and Protection Fund) Authority.
  • The Central Government, State Government, or any local authority.
  • A reporting company, or a body corporate, or an entity controlled by the Central or State Government(s).
  • SEBI-registered Investment Vehicles such as Mutual Funds, Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs).
  • Investment vehicles regulated by RBI, IRDAI, or PFRDA.

It’s crucial to note that these exemptions are subject to specific conditions mentioned within the SBO Rules. If a company believes it falls under an exemption, it should carefully verify the criteria or seek professional advice, as misinterpreting exemption clauses can lead to non-compliance.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with the Significant Beneficial Ownership requirements under Section 90 and the SBO Rules can lead to severe penalties for the company, its officers, and the SBOs themselves. Ensuring beneficial ownership compliance India is therefore critical.

Penalties for the Reporting Company and Officers

If a reporting company fails to comply with its duties – such as not taking steps to identify SBOs, not maintaining the Register (BEN-3), or failing to file Form BEN-2 with the RoC within the specified time – the company and every officer in default can face significant penalties. The Companies Act, 2013 prescribes hefty fines for such non-compliance. The penalties can include substantial monetary fines which may extend significantly, and for continuing failure, an additional daily penalty may apply. This underscores the importance of proactive Section 90 compliance India.

Penalties for the Significant Beneficial Owner

The SBO also faces penalties for non-compliance. If an individual who is required to make a declaration in Form BEN-1 fails to do so within the stipulated time, or submits false or incorrect information, they can be penalized under the Act. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, or both. The potential for personal liability, including imprisonment, highlights the seriousness with which these disclosure norms for beneficial ownership India must be treated by individuals identified as SBOs.

Other Potential Consequences

Beyond direct financial penalties and potential imprisonment, non-compliance can trigger further actions. If an SBO fails to provide the required information or makes a false declaration, the company (or potentially shareholders or authorities) can apply to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The NCLT has the power to impose restrictions on the relevant shares, which could include:

  • Restrictions on the transfer of shares.
  • Suspension of all rights attached to the shares (like voting rights or dividend rights).

These potential NCLT actions can severely impact the SBO’s interest and the functioning of the company, further emphasizing the need for strict adherence to Section 90 compliance India.

Conclusion

Understanding and adhering to the rules surrounding Significant Beneficial Ownership is no longer optional; it’s a mandatory requirement for corporate transparency in India. The core takeaway is clear: individuals who meet the SBO criteria must proactively declare their status to the company using Form BEN-1. In turn, companies must diligently identify these SBOs, potentially using Form BEN-4, file the received information with the RoC via Form BEN-2, and meticulously maintain the Register of SBOs in Form BEN-3.

Compliance with these disclosure requirements Section 90 India is vital not just for avoiding hefty penalties and potential legal action, but also for maintaining good corporate governance and contributing to a more transparent business environment. Navigating the nuances of indirect holdings, thresholds, and disclosure norms for beneficial ownership India can sometimes be complex. If you need assistance identifying SBOs, preparing documentation, ensuring timely filings, or understanding the full scope of Section 90 compliance India for your business, expert help is recommended. Contact TaxRobo today for professional guidance and compliance services tailored to your needs.

For ongoing tax compliance support, you may want to consider our comprehensive TAXATION SERVICES IN INDIA which includes expert advice on regulatory and filing requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the exact percentage threshold for being considered a Significant Beneficial Owner in India?

Answer: An individual is generally considered an SBO if they, directly or indirectly (or together with direct holdings), hold at least 10% of the company’s shares, 10% of the voting rights, or the right to receive at least 10% of distributable dividends. Additionally, having the right to exercise or actually exercising significant influence or control (other than just through direct holdings) can also qualify someone as an SBO. Always refer to the latest Companies (SBO) Rules on the MCA website for precise definitions.

Q2: I am an SBO. By when do I need to inform the company using Form BEN-1?

Answer: You must file Form BEN-1 with the reporting company within 30 days of acquiring the status of a Significant Beneficial Owner. If there is any change in your SBO status (e.g., increase or decrease in shareholding crossing a threshold), you must report this change within 30 days as well.

Q3: What happens if a company fails to file Form BEN-2 with the RoC on time?

Answer: If a company fails to file Form BEN-2 (the return of SBOs) with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days of receiving the BEN-1 declaration, the company and its officers who are in default are liable for significant penalties as prescribed under Section 90(11) of the Companies Act, 2013. This includes a substantial initial fine and a potential further daily fine for continued non-compliance.

Q4: Do these rules apply if the Significant Beneficial Owner resides outside India?

Answer: Yes, the SBO rules apply based on the beneficial interest held in an Indian reporting company. The residency status of the SBO (whether they are in India or abroad) does not exempt them from the requirement. A non-resident individual who qualifies as an SBO must still submit the Form BEN-1 declaration to the Indian company.

Q5: Are listed companies also required to comply with SBO rules?

Answer: Generally, yes. While listed companies have various disclosure requirements under SEBI regulations (which might capture some similar information), the fundamental requirement to identify and report SBOs under Section 90 of the Companies Act and the SBO Rules applies unless a specific exemption under the SBO rules is met (e.g., regarding holdings by certain regulated investment vehicles). Listed companies should ensure compliance with both sets of regulations. It’s advisable to seek specific professional advice regarding the interplay of Companies Act and SEBI rules.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *